I agree with a lot of this. The clues here are probably not enough for most people to infer the person on their own, unless the number of guesses is upped to like 15. A lot of them are either very broad (like which games), or very narrow (like which star). A good set of clues will have some inbetween clues to narrow down the space more. Some of them, like the place of origin, will sometimes do that. But not reliably (there are a lot of charactres from 'Unknown'). Weapon typeWas hoping to come back and edit my words, but already got a response so some more in depth thoughts:
Right now, this feels like a "Who's that Pokemon?" that... has some wordle-like concepts if someone actually doesn't get it first try. You either know it first try (most people will know it first try), or you don't, and it really overshadows the interesting wordle-like ideas and the potential strategy behind that.
The interesting concepts behind worlde (imo) are the strategic components. Everyone has a different "starting word" and there are various strategies.
I don't know if the clues are enough for people to guess in a reasonable number of attempts, but I think that would be much more interesting than this.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest